Systems | Development | Analytics | API | Testing

Every customer interaction generates signals that matter—a failed checkout, repeated form errors, a frustrated support call, a confusing AI agent exchange, or an unresolved email thread. Individually, these are isolated events. Connected, they reveal customer intent, friction points, operational risk, and opportunities for action.

Engineering is in the middle of an almighty shift. Thanks to AI code-generation solutions, Engineers are being asked to take on a different and wider set of responsibilities in order to be more productive. It’s what’s increasingly being coined as Agentic Engineering - using AI agents to accelerate engineering & operations work while maintaining human oversight, quality and rigour.

The challenge of any aerospace company is to deliver new capabilities without compromising safety, reliability, or precision. At our current juncture, legacy technology runs into conflict with modern tool stacks. Artificial intelligence (AI) creates fissures in compliance and auditability, and innovation and productivity gains come at a cost of greater complexity. Despite these seismic shifts, the central question remains the same.

“Garbage in, garbage out.” We are not the ones who said this, George Fuechsel did. But when we are talking about AI today, it is hard not to repeat it. We spend a lot of time discussing what AI can do, the outputs, the predictions, the impact it can create. Much less attention goes to what is actually going into these systems.

It's easy to get caught up in the AI hype, but excitement can stop us from seeing the practical steps needed to make AI truly work. At Appian, we recognize that AI is at its most powerful within a process. Before you get to embedding AI in process, however, you must determine if AI is what you need.

We’re introducing enhanced visibility for streaming workload performance on Confluent Cloud, making it easier for developers and operators to understand, troubleshoot, and optimize real-time applications. As Apache Kafka has become the backbone of data streaming, many teams rely on Confluent Cloud for its scale, elasticity, and reduced operational burden.

Organizations are under pressure to feed data lakes and lakehouses with fresher data while keeping a tight lid on cloud spend. The problem is that most ingestion stacks weren’t designed for the real-time, high-volume workloads that power modern analytics and artificial intelligence (AI). They rely on layers of connectors, ETL jobs, and maintenance processes that quietly inflate both infrastructure and operational costs. Confluent’s Tableflow was built to change that equation.

CodePush is a great way to ship over-the-air (OTA) updates, avoid app store approval delays, and roll out changes cautiously. Even though App Center has closed down, there are many options available to get started with CodePush. But some of the default settings can create undesirable behaviors, leaving teams wrongly thinking CodePush causes a bad user experience.

It happens to all of us. As software projects grow, parts of the production code we ship end up without a comprehensive test suite. When you take another look at the same area of code after a few months, it may be difficult to understand; even worse, there might be a bug, and we don't know where to begin fixing it. Modifying production code without tests is a major challenge.

The first-ever Sembi Software Quality Pulse Report is based on nearly 4,000 responses from QA engineers, developers, security professionals, and engineering leaders worldwide. The findings paint a picture of an industry in motion—and a QA function that increasingly relies on tighter integration, thoughtful AI adoption, and better-connected workflows to keep up. Here's a look at some of the data that matters most for agile QA teams working inside Jira-native environments. TL;DR.