Systems | Development | Analytics | API | Testing

In my experience working with enterprise leaders, the journey to the cloud rarely follows a straight line. Many organizations set ambitious goals to move all operations to the cloud. They quickly find that certain legacy systems must remain on-premises. This reality results in a complex, hybrid multicloud environment. That means they need to adopt a new strategy for managing test data.

According to the Perforce 2026 State of DevOps report, 77% of organizations express high confidence in the outputs generated by their artificial intelligence systems. Yet, this widespread optimism masks a critical vulnerability. While executive confidence in AI results remains high, only 38% of organizations have embedded AI deeply across their delivery stages. Plus, only 39% maintain the fully automated audit trails required to verify these results.

Security expectations for version control infrastructure have evolved dramatically over the years. While Perforce P4 has always empowered administrators with deep configurability, the default configurations shipped with previous versions of P4 are no longer sufficient. With the upcoming P4 2026.1 (scheduled for availability in May), we are implementing a Secure by Default posture designed to enforce best practices when protecting the source code and binary assets stored in P4.

For decades, software engineers have relied heavily on C and C++ to build embedded systems. These legacy languages offer the deep control and speed required for constrained environments, but they reveal gaps in memory management and concurrency. The Rust programming language has emerged as a solution.

Unaccounted data copies within non-production environments can make enterprises vulnerable to cyber theft. Non-production environments — which are often less secure than production environments — are treasure troves for hackers seeking to steal customer data. How many copies of test data are currently floating around your organization’s non-production environments?

FTI audits are designed to ensure sensitive tax data is properly protected. But in modern enterprises, they’re about much more than passing inspections. Today, you need to manage FTI securely while still enabling fast, reliable access to data across DevOps, analytics, and increasingly, AI workflows. Treating FTI audits as part of a broader data strategy helps teams reduce risk without slowing innovation or creating bottlenecks.

Software defects don’t just drain budgets; they cost businesses customer loyalty. Poor software quality can lead to poor customer experience and drive customer churn, resulting in missed revenue and increased expenses. Learn how better processes, such as test data management, can reduce the cost of software defects and protect your business outcomes.

With the rise of AI use in vehicle software development, concerns arise around its presence in safety-critical applications, especially when it comes to functional safety and regulatory compliance. ISO 26262, the essential standard for automotive development that requires processes for managing, designing, and verifying safety-critical systems, still applies. However, it can fall short when applied to AI models, which are inherently non-deterministic and continuously evolving.