Systems | Development | Analytics | API | Testing

What is an MCP Registry? The Centralized Directory for AI Agents

A guide to learning how MCP registries help govern AI agent-to-tool connectivity AI agents are only as capable as the tools they can reach. When an agent needs to query a database, file a support ticket, or pull data from a CRM, it has to find the right tool, authenticate, and invoke it — all at runtime. The Model Context Protocol (MCP) standardizes how agents communicate with these tools. But MCP alone does not answer a fundamental question: how does the agent know which tools exist?
Sponsored Post

Run Local LLMs on Mac to Cut Claude Costs

Part of the motivation for this post is how cloud API economics are shifting: Anthropic is moving large enterprise customers toward per-token, usage-based billing (unbundled from flat seat fees), which makes "always call the API" a moving cost line for teams at scale. A hybrid or local layer is one way to keep spend bounded while you still use premium models where they matter.

PostgreSQL MCP Server: Setup, Security & Best Practices for AI Agents

Last updated: May 2026 A PostgreSQL MCP server is a service that exposes PostgreSQL databases as tools an AI agent can call through the Model Context Protocol (MCP). Rather than giving an LLM direct database credentials, you put an MCP server between the agent and the database. The agent discovers what queries it can run, calls them as named tools, and the MCP server translates those calls into safe, governed SQL against PostgreSQL.

Scale AI test automation without losing visibility | QMetry + Reflect integration

AI is changing how testing gets done. As automation grows, so does the complexity of tracking what’s been tested, what passed, and what’s ready to release. See how SmartBear Reflect and QMetry work together to scale AI-powered test automation without losing visibility or control. Reflect makes it easy to create and run automated tests using plain language, while QMetry brings structure to that speed, connecting tests, results, and reporting into a single system of record.

How to set up Billing for AI Agents with LangChain and Kong in 15 Minutes | Monetize AI Agents

Want to bill customers for the AI tokens they actually use? This video shows you how to set up a LangChain app that meters LLM token usage and streams it to Kong Konnect Metering & Billing as CloudEvents — turning every prompt and response into invoiced usage, automatically.

Stop Subsidizing Innovation, Start Monetizing It

The ‘AI Credit’ Economy: GitHub’s Pricing Shift Is the Beginning, Not the Exception *GitHub just sent waves of budget panic across its developer base. Seat-based Copilot pricing is out. Consumption-based credits are in. And if you're building an AI-driven product today on flat-rate pricing? You're building a problem into your roadmap.* Seats aren't going away, but they now fund a shared pool of AI credits (one credit = one cent) instead of unlocking uncapped use.

Self-Healing Test Automation: How It Works And How To Implement It

Your team ships a UI update on Monday. By Tuesday morning, 47 automated tests are failing and half of them are not real bugs. They broke because a button ID changed from confirmButton to confirm-purchase-btn. Your engineers spend hours figuring out what is an actual regression and what is just a broken locator. Self healing test automation solves this by allowing tests to automatically recover from UI changes, locator failures, timing issues, and API schema updates without constant manual fixes.

API Testing Tools: The Complete Guide For 2026

Key Takeaway The best API testing tool in 2026 depends entirely on what your team is trying to do. If you want to stop writing tests by hand and automatically generate them from real traffic, Keploy is the only open-source tool built specifically for that. For manual exploration, Bruno and Postman are your best options. For Java teams, REST Assured and Karate are still the gold standard. This guide organizes all 12 tools by what you actually need, not just a ranked list.

AI code created a new testing problem | From the Bear Cave Ep. 3

SmartBear’s study Closing the AI software quality gap found that 60% of teams have already experienced quality issues tied to AI-generated code, evidence of how increased abstraction is changing how software gets built. When development shifts from well-defined requirements to prompts and generated outputs, it becomes much harder to understand what the system is actually supposed to do, and what you should be testing against.